Spiga

Electric vehicles in India

Any topic on electric vehicles (EVs) in India would invariably veer (at least for now) toward the Reva, by the Mahindra and Mahindra and Maini group joint-venture (Mahindra Reva Electric Vehicles Private Limited). Founded in 1994 by Sudarshan Maini and based in Bangalore, the Reva Electric Car Company, is involved in designing and manufacturing of compact EVs. In fact, the Reva (the present generation called the REVAi) is the largest selling EV in the world, not because of its range (80 kilometer) or its looks, but simply because of its price. The Reva (priced at approximately US$7,000) is five to 142 times cheaper than the Nissan Leaf and the Tesla Roadster, respectively!

Anyway, this write-up is not about the Reva, but to take the Reva as an example and try and discuss the ‘plight’ of EVs in India.

I have stayed in Bangalore for about four years before moving up north to the Delhi NCR. During my stay in Bangalore, the Reva was a pretty common sight, and I would see at least one of those EVs on my way to office or back. However, in the national capital region, I have failed to spot a single Reva in the one and a half years that I have been here. This made me ponder about this disparity, because Delhi and its satellite townships are a fair representation on the automotive scene in India.
I was fairly surprised and began thinking about why there is this divide in accepting an EV across different cities. And also on the fact that if there were to be more EVs in India, would there be a difference in mass acceptance, based on demographics, customer taste and infrastructure availability, or rather the lack of it.
Here is what I figured out:
  • Infrastructure: In Delhi, people fight for parking space. They get physically violent and at times your car is parked more than 300 meters from where you stay. In Bangalore, people usually have verbal altercations and generally mange to park their cars where they can see it. In some places in Delhi, the lanes are so narrow that it is almost impossible to park your car next to your house without causing an impediment to traffic. So, keeping an EV in Delhi can be quite a task, because recharging it would be a nightmare. Even office parking slots do not provide charging points for EVs. Essentially, it is much more practical to own and operate an EV in Bangalore, compared to Delhi.

Also, after sales and service for the Reva is negligible, if not altogether absent. As a consumer, everybody expects their car to be taken care of in an authorised service station for at least three years post-purchase. Mahindra and Reva need to increase the number of after sales service centers for people to feel comfortable buying their product. In fact, both Mahindra and Reva need to leverage the Mahindra service network and consciously draw consumers’ attention to the fact that the Mahindra network is there to support Reva consumers.
  • Power scenario: In the satellite townships of Delhi, such as Gurgaon, power supply is very erratic. Power-cuts last up to eight hours at a stretch, and eight-hour-long power-cuts are not one-off incidents, they happen on a weekly basis. So, if you are in Gurgaon, even if you could park your EV in your living room, you still would not be able to recharge its batteries. Comparatively, Bangalore has fewer power-cuts and they generally do not last more than an hour. Also, electricity is far dearer in the NCR region – it could go up to INR7 per unit at places.
  • Customer taste and requirement: This is a very subjective factor and it holds true not only for EVs, but all automobiles in general. For instance, you will see more white cars up north and more black cars down south. Indian consumers have different preferences for different colors in different regions. Coming back to EVs, no doubt the Reva back-up as the second car in all households in Bangalore, but in Delhi, the second car would be a Chevrolet Beat, or even a Tata Nano, but never a Reva. Quite possibly, because of the other factors I mentioned that go against the Reva, but also possibly because the Reva, is not up to the taste of consumers in the North. Bigger cars still hold an appeal up North. (You might want to argue about the Nano in the previous sentence; but the Nano is much roomier and has a sense of pride in ownership due to all the news it generated and because it is from Tata)
  • Government initiative: It is a known fact that new technology cannot find mass-acceptance without government support. True that the Indian government has started, or at least given thought, to providing subsidies for EV and alternate powertrain suppliers and manufacturers. That is the first step and not sufficient enough to drive EV acceptance in India. Consumers should also benefit for choosing lesser polluting vehicles. Also, state governments should do away with taxes and levies on selling EVs. This will bring a price uniformity for EVs across states.

Therefore, I think that for EVs to be successful in India, we need to consider different markets (read cities) as unique and offer different solutions for the mass acceptance of the EV. A solution for the success of EVs in Pune, will not work in Chennai. India needs to be segregated on the basis of the different parameters mentioned above. However, on a national level, the issues of power and infrastructure shortage, state government encouragement, and the likes will still act against the interest of EVs. For that matter, pure-play EVs might not be the solution to clean transportation in India at all. Maybe, we need to replicate the success of CNG buses in the passenger vehicle domain, or maybe, we need to think of more indigenous alternate fuels, such as biogas. In fact, cheaper, cleaner and efficient last-mile connectivity could become a panacea for traffic congestion and vehicle pollution in India. We could, in theory, bypass the trials of alternate powertrain and be an example in efficient public transportation solutions, just like we bypassed the muscle car era and hopped straight on to compact cars, which are only beginning to make their mark in older and more mature automotive markets.

About time Honda India pulls up it socks

The other day I was thinking about Honda India's strategy, or rather the lack of it. Today I read in the Wall Street Journal and the Times of India that Honda has cut the price of its entry level sedan, the City by 4-8 percent. This will bring down the price of the City by at least INR44,000 from the present price of INR749,000 (ex-showroom price for the base model in New Delhi). A rather delayed reaction to present automotive market dynamics in India, but a very welcome one, nonetheless.

Although not as big as its Japanese brethren -- Toyota and Nissan -- Honda enjoyed a first-movers advantage in the Indian automotive market during the mid-90s, and has since then earned an enviable brand recall as a maker of quality and reliable cars. During the same time, other global OEMs such as GM, Ford, Hyundai and Renault too were trying to grab a share of the gradually growing Indian passenger vehicle market pie. The Americans and the French failed mostly due to outdated products and wrong calculations of the market pulse. The Koreans, due to the right product -- a feature rich hatchback, the Santro -- not only made a successful entry, but went on to become the number 2 in the 3.5 million strong current market.

Honda, on the other hand ignored the 75 percent share of the auto market -- hatchbacks, and focused on sedans (globally, the small car segment, or the sub-C segment), and launched the City. At the time of the City's introduction, the sedan segment in India was dominated by the Maruti-Suzuki Esteem and followed by the Ford Escort, the Opel Astra and the Daewoo Cielo. The American cars were based on outdated platforms and never made it big in India. The Esteem and the Cielo were popular models because they were affordable and comparatively more reliable. However, the quality and performance aspects were totally missing. It was this large gap that the Honda City filled along with the Mitsubishi Lancer (the Lancer was the only other sedan in its class that provided competition to the City).

Since then, the City has been bread and butter for Honda India. Honda asked a premium for the City as there were no other products to compete with it and rich Indians complied. Some defied and bought the Lancer instead. Honda's India operations were profitable. However, the party was spoiled as the average salaried Indian started earning more and other OEMs started looking at the Indian market in earnest and launched competitive models. Honda's sales volumes took a hit.

And its been down for a while. Honda plans to boost sales of the City by this price cut. However there are deeper problems within Honda India and it products.

Here is my take on Honda India's issues:
  • Pricing - The Indian automotive market is highly competitive now. At three-fourths of the City's cost Hyundai and Maruti-Suzuki offers sedans with more features and creature comfort. Honda's lone hatchback, the Jazz, is priced around INR650,000. At the same price point most OEMs offer sedans. This is an important factor as the car is still an aspirational object for majority of buyers in India -- bigger is still better.
  • Local sourcing - Honda sources ~60 percent of the components for it cars (the Jazz, the City, the CR-V and the Accord) locally in India. Its competitors source 80-90 percent components locally and are aiming for 100 percent local sourcing. Local sourcing reduces input costs for automakers and is reflected in the bottom line of the company's books. It also helps reduce custom duties in many essential components, such as engines.
  • Diesel powertrains - With petrol prices nearly touching INR70 per liter, new car buyers are seriously considering diesel vehicles. Even if petrol and diesel prices were to be equal, ~35 percent Indian car buyers (personal estimate) would still prefer diesel powerplants. So, literally Honda could add 35 percent more sales volume. Anyway, with diesel engines becoming more efficient and less polluting, it is a very bad strategy to not have diesel powertrains, not only in India, but globally. Honda and Mitsubishi are the only OEMs in India that do not have a diesel option.
Three basic points, and Honda could once again dominate the entry-level sedan market in India.


Live Activity Feed