Spiga

Showing posts with label mahindra and mahindra. Show all posts
Showing posts with label mahindra and mahindra. Show all posts

Electric vehicles in India

Any topic on electric vehicles (EVs) in India would invariably veer (at least for now) toward the Reva, by the Mahindra and Mahindra and Maini group joint-venture (Mahindra Reva Electric Vehicles Private Limited). Founded in 1994 by Sudarshan Maini and based in Bangalore, the Reva Electric Car Company, is involved in designing and manufacturing of compact EVs. In fact, the Reva (the present generation called the REVAi) is the largest selling EV in the world, not because of its range (80 kilometer) or its looks, but simply because of its price. The Reva (priced at approximately US$7,000) is five to 142 times cheaper than the Nissan Leaf and the Tesla Roadster, respectively!

Anyway, this write-up is not about the Reva, but to take the Reva as an example and try and discuss the ‘plight’ of EVs in India.

I have stayed in Bangalore for about four years before moving up north to the Delhi NCR. During my stay in Bangalore, the Reva was a pretty common sight, and I would see at least one of those EVs on my way to office or back. However, in the national capital region, I have failed to spot a single Reva in the one and a half years that I have been here. This made me ponder about this disparity, because Delhi and its satellite townships are a fair representation on the automotive scene in India.
I was fairly surprised and began thinking about why there is this divide in accepting an EV across different cities. And also on the fact that if there were to be more EVs in India, would there be a difference in mass acceptance, based on demographics, customer taste and infrastructure availability, or rather the lack of it.
Here is what I figured out:
  • Infrastructure: In Delhi, people fight for parking space. They get physically violent and at times your car is parked more than 300 meters from where you stay. In Bangalore, people usually have verbal altercations and generally mange to park their cars where they can see it. In some places in Delhi, the lanes are so narrow that it is almost impossible to park your car next to your house without causing an impediment to traffic. So, keeping an EV in Delhi can be quite a task, because recharging it would be a nightmare. Even office parking slots do not provide charging points for EVs. Essentially, it is much more practical to own and operate an EV in Bangalore, compared to Delhi.

Also, after sales and service for the Reva is negligible, if not altogether absent. As a consumer, everybody expects their car to be taken care of in an authorised service station for at least three years post-purchase. Mahindra and Reva need to increase the number of after sales service centers for people to feel comfortable buying their product. In fact, both Mahindra and Reva need to leverage the Mahindra service network and consciously draw consumers’ attention to the fact that the Mahindra network is there to support Reva consumers.
  • Power scenario: In the satellite townships of Delhi, such as Gurgaon, power supply is very erratic. Power-cuts last up to eight hours at a stretch, and eight-hour-long power-cuts are not one-off incidents, they happen on a weekly basis. So, if you are in Gurgaon, even if you could park your EV in your living room, you still would not be able to recharge its batteries. Comparatively, Bangalore has fewer power-cuts and they generally do not last more than an hour. Also, electricity is far dearer in the NCR region – it could go up to INR7 per unit at places.
  • Customer taste and requirement: This is a very subjective factor and it holds true not only for EVs, but all automobiles in general. For instance, you will see more white cars up north and more black cars down south. Indian consumers have different preferences for different colors in different regions. Coming back to EVs, no doubt the Reva back-up as the second car in all households in Bangalore, but in Delhi, the second car would be a Chevrolet Beat, or even a Tata Nano, but never a Reva. Quite possibly, because of the other factors I mentioned that go against the Reva, but also possibly because the Reva, is not up to the taste of consumers in the North. Bigger cars still hold an appeal up North. (You might want to argue about the Nano in the previous sentence; but the Nano is much roomier and has a sense of pride in ownership due to all the news it generated and because it is from Tata)
  • Government initiative: It is a known fact that new technology cannot find mass-acceptance without government support. True that the Indian government has started, or at least given thought, to providing subsidies for EV and alternate powertrain suppliers and manufacturers. That is the first step and not sufficient enough to drive EV acceptance in India. Consumers should also benefit for choosing lesser polluting vehicles. Also, state governments should do away with taxes and levies on selling EVs. This will bring a price uniformity for EVs across states.

Therefore, I think that for EVs to be successful in India, we need to consider different markets (read cities) as unique and offer different solutions for the mass acceptance of the EV. A solution for the success of EVs in Pune, will not work in Chennai. India needs to be segregated on the basis of the different parameters mentioned above. However, on a national level, the issues of power and infrastructure shortage, state government encouragement, and the likes will still act against the interest of EVs. For that matter, pure-play EVs might not be the solution to clean transportation in India at all. Maybe, we need to replicate the success of CNG buses in the passenger vehicle domain, or maybe, we need to think of more indigenous alternate fuels, such as biogas. In fact, cheaper, cleaner and efficient last-mile connectivity could become a panacea for traffic congestion and vehicle pollution in India. We could, in theory, bypass the trials of alternate powertrain and be an example in efficient public transportation solutions, just like we bypassed the muscle car era and hopped straight on to compact cars, which are only beginning to make their mark in older and more mature automotive markets.

M&M acquires Ssangyong - Can we say that finally?

Okay, we have been hearing about the Mahindra & Mahindra acquisition of Ssangyong for a while now and no further developments have been heard of; however, there is definitive news that M&M will buy a majority stake in the smallest of the Korean car makers, Ssangyong, by end-2010 or early 2011. At this stage there are no details of the amount involved in the acquisition. M&M mentioned that it will go through the final due diligence of Ssangyong sometime in September 2010 and then fix the deal.

Not many people have seen Ssangyong cars, rather SUVs - that is what this Korean car maker specializes in - low-priced, robust SUVs. The Korean SUV maker has vehicles like Rexton, Kyron, Rodius and one sedan in its entire line-up - the Chairman.

M&M, through this deal, can expand its line-up of SUVs; but when it comes to sedans - the basic ingredient for any versatile car maker - I can only hope that M&M does not have another sour experience like the Logan. Ssangyong, on the other hand, will not go bankrupt and have access to more markets and M&M's technology. With this deal, M&M is giving out all the signals that it intends to focus on SUVs - at a time when people are selling off their gas guzzlers and shifting to more fuel-efficient vehicles. Lets hope that M&M becomes the phoenix of the SUV market , and brings out SUVs that suit the taste and needs of the present and future markets - vehicles with more high-end torque, yet thrifty on fuel consumption.

Here is a ball-park SWOT analysis of M&M:


Strengths:
  • Well established as an utility and farm equipment manufacturer.
  • Has dealer networks in the US, South Africa, Latin America and other key markets.
  • Diversified business and hence the group has financial stability.
  • Few model line-up in the passenger vehicle segment, hence less complexity. Has the advantage to design a new global vehicle platform and bring out different products.
  • Has been making vehicles since the 1940s and has a lineage of sorts.
Weaknesses:
  • Does not yet have a mass-market sedan or hatchback - and hence missing out on the major passenger vehicle market share.
  • Has not yet reached the levels of international collaboration needed to bring out world-class petrol/diesel engines in the 1.3 to 1.6 liter displacement range, to be globally viable.
  • Vehicle platforms are dated and the company is still perceived as essentially commercial vehicle manufacturers.
  • Cannot really go global with just utility vehicles and SUVs. The Scorpio cannot sustain M&M for long.
Opportunities:
  • Emerging markets in South Asia, like Vietnam, Thailand and Indonesia, markets in Eastern Europe, like Russia, Turkey, et al and Latin American markets. M&M needs to develop a small/mid-segment sedan or hatchback to shares in these markets.
  • The acquisition of Reva holds lot of potential. M&M should aggressively pursue electric vehicle development at this moment, and if done properly, the company will have a headstart over many smaller but global players.
  • M&M should invest its research rupees in developing a global small SUV - which is the fad and demand of the day. It already has the expertise and just needs to tweak the engine and platform a little bit.
Threats:
  • The biggest threat for M&M is Tata Motors and the Chinese companies.
  • Other OEMs comparable to M&M are increasingly entering into technology sharing partnerships and thus have access to better technology.
  • Consumers in India and other potential markets have more options to choose from and if M&M does not diversify its product portfolio it will lose out to competition.

For those who have not seen Ssangyong vehicles:


                                                                           Rexton


Live Activity Feed